Leaving Time by Jodi Picoult

When was the last time you read a book that left you sobbing at the end?  Leaving Time was just such a book for me.  That makes it particularly hard to write a review of this book as I don’t want to ruin the experience for someone else!

Leaving Time had a very unique premise.  Jenna Metcalf is a young thirteen old girl that wants to finally discover the truth behind her mother’s appearance.  Her mother was an elephant researcher, Alice Metcalf, who disappeared when Jenna was only three.  Jenna’s parents ran an elephant sanctuary in Northeast United States.  Through some sort of strange series of events a woman was trampled to death at the sanctuary and Alice was found farther away knocked out.  After being taken to the hospital, she checked herself out in the night never to be seen again.  Where did Alice go?  Is she still alive?

Jenna enlists the help of Serenity, a psychic who was once famous, but has lost her power.  Serenity seems to be able to help Jenna find clues, and together the two of them enlist Virgil, the original detective on the case who now a drunken private eye.  Virgil is sure he made a mistake a decade before.  Will this cast of misfits solve the mystery?

The narrative is told from Jenna, Serenity, and Alice.  Alice’s point of view is her research into the grieving of elephants and motherly bonds that she first researched in Africa, and then starts telling her story of meeting Thomas, Jenna’s father, and her journey to living at an elephant sanctuary and becoming a mother.  I really liked the narrative and found it unique.  The story was engaging and page turning and I really liked the characters.

This book was a second book choice for the FLICKS (aka Rogue) Book and Movie Club.  We sadly had to cancel our May meeting due to everyone being busy.  I hope that we get to discuss our books at some point!  This one has a lot to discuss, especially as mothers.

My favorite quotes:

“I would argue that there is a special empathy elephants have for mothers and children – either their own species’s or another’s.  That relationship seems to hold a precious significance and a bittersweet knowledge:  An elephant seems to understand that if you lose a baby, you suffer.”

“There’s no biological advantage to grief.  In fact, in the wild, it can be downright dangerous to be moping around or swearing off food.”

“It is a fact universally acknowledge, there is not greater force on earth than a mother’s revenge.”  I love Serenity’s call back to Pride and Prejudice here.

Overall, Leaving Time is a very engaging novel, with a unique storyline and great characters.  I really like the story of grief, of mothers and daughters, and how much I learned about elephants.  I also like learning more about psychics as well.  I highly recommend this book . . . although bring a box of Kleenex when you are reading it!

Book Source:  The Kewaunee Public Library

Small Great Things by Jodi Picoult

Small Great Things is the May book club pick for the FLICKS Book and Movie (aka Rogue) Club.  I think this novel will provide ample discussion at our book club next week.

Ruth Jefferson has been a labor and delivery nurse for twenty years.  She’s a widow who loves her job and her son, Edison.  She has been trying to make a great life for Edison making sure they are in a good school district and putting away money for his education. One day, Ruth is doing a routine check on a newborn and feels an odd vibe in the room, especially after the father tells her to stay away from his wife and that he wants to see her supervisor.  Ruth then finds out that they do not want any African American personnel working on their child.  As the only African American labor and delivery nurse, Ruth feels affronted.  Later during an emergency, Ruth hesitates to perform CPR on the baby before the rest of the staff get there.  Did this hesitation cause the baby’s death? 

Ruth’s world is torn apart with losing her job, her nursing license, and getting arrested.  White public defender, Kennedy McQuarrie gets her case, but says they must not mention race in the courtroom.  Kennedy gets to know Ruth and her story and her thoughts about race make a change in Kennedy throughout the novel.  Will Ruth end up in jail or will the truth set her free?

The story was told through the point of view of Ruth, Kennedy, and Turk, the white supremacist father.  I liked the different viewpoints, but really felt this was Ruth’s story.  I had a real hard time reading Turk’s chapters.

I’m really torn on this novel.  The story was definitely page turning, but several notes of the story rang false to me.  First of all, I kept thinking this book was hitting so many items from my Living Inclusively and Teaching Inclusively classes – sometimes word for word on discussions we had in class.  Then I got to the Acknowledgments section and saw a thanks to Dr. Beverly Daniel Tatum who literally wrote the textbook we used in our classes.  Overall, this made the book odd to me at times like it was a part of a classroom lecture.

Secondly, just like in that class, I had problems with the thesis set forth by modern diversity classes.  As Picoult states in her afterword, “I expect pushback from this book.  I will have people of color challenging me for choosing a topic that doesn’t belong to me.  I will have white people challenging me for calling them on their racism.”  I had a problem with both of these items.  I feel that novels or non-fiction written by African Americans on their experiences ring so much truer - such as The Color Purple, I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, and The Grace of Silence.  I had a problem that in this book Picoult seems to think there are only two kinds of white people – raging racists, and everyone else who things they are not racist, but really are inside.  This was the general premise of my diversity class as well.  Why is there not room for a third type of white person that respects people of all backgrounds and understands history and the struggles that African Americans have gone through?  That we truly can’t understand the African American experience as we aren’t African American, but we can acknowledge that they have a lot to deal with that a white person never has to experience?  I feel like the tenants of Dr. Beverly Tatum that are parroted by Picoult are only used to drive a wedge between people with no path forward.

Third, I had a problem with the characterizations of the white supremacists.  They were 100% evil and it was hard to feel any empathy for them.  They were one dimensional and without trying to give anything away, the ending of the book rang false as we hadn’t really gotten to know these characters besides the fact that they were very terrible people who had no problem with beating up others and killing neighbors’ dogs.  I’m not a fan of white supremacists, but to make this novel work, especially the ending, having them written as multi-dimensional would have served the story so much better.

I thought it was clever that the baby involved in the story is named Davis and Ruth’s last name was Jefferson.  I’m not sure if that was intentional to make me think about Jefferson Davis and the confederacy.

The White supremacists sections were frightening.  To think that such people live amongst us and have gatherings in the woods to sell swastikas and the like with their families is horrifying.  It would explain a lot of what we see today.

I related to Kennedy discovering that her mother watches Fox news with her young daughter and her displeasure with it.  I have the same thing happening to my own children.  Also a quote from her mother “You know, if they weren’t so angry all of the time, maybe more people would listen to them,” could have directly come from many of my family members.

Favorite quotes:

“I don’t have a problem with white people.  I live in a white community; I have white friends; I send my son to a predominantly white school.  I treat them the way I want to be treated – based on their individual merits as human beings, not on their skin tone.” – Ruth

“Trayvon was a good kid, a smart boy.  You are a respected nurse.  The reason that judge didn’t want to bring race – the same reason your lawyer is skirting like it’s the plague – is because Black people like you and Trayvon are supposed to be the exceptions.  You are the very definition of when bad things happen to good people.  Because that is the only way white gatekeepers can make excuses for their behavior.  But what if that’s not the truth?  What if you and Trayvon aren’t the exceptions . . . but the rule?  What if injustice is the standard?” – Wallace Mercy

“The State just sees a dead baby. They’re targeting you because they think you failed as a nurse.”

“You’re wrong.” I shake my head in the darkness, and I say the words I’ve swallowed down my whole life. “They’re targeting me because I’m Black." (Kennedy and Ruth)

Overall, Small Great Things is a page-turning novel that should prompt good discussion at my book club.  I felt that the storyline was too much like my diversity textbook at times and didn’t really flesh out the “bad guys” to give the ending believability.  For a great book on diversity and living the African American experience I would highly recommend The Grace of Silence by Michele Norris.

Book Source:  The Kewaunee Public Library

The Jodi Picoult Project

One of my favorite blogs has a new interesting reading Challenge. Suko’s Notebook has introduced The Jodi Picoult Project. For this challenge, one needs to commit to reading at least one novel by this prolific author. The reading challenge will run from October 2011 through October 2012.


I enjoy Jodi Picoult’s novels and I have two on my shelf that I borrowed from my sister-in-law, Sing You Home and House Rules that I need to read. I also would love to read Plain Truth and Salem Falls. These two novels were my good friend Laura Hivala’s favorite Picoult novels. She recommended them to me and I’ve had them on my to-read list for quite a while! I’ll try to read these four books over the next year . . . or at least one of them!

Thank-you for the great new challenge Suko!