Gone with the Wind was a spring read for the Back to the Classics Book Club at the Kewaunee Public Library. This was my third time reading this novel in my life. I read it first in middle school and last time in my later twenties. I seem to have a different perspective and learn something new every time I read it. One thing I realized this time is that it works a lot better for me to read it straight through rather than to read half of it for one book club discussion and then finish it a couple of months later for the second book club discussion.
Gone With the Wind is an epic, layered novel with some
of the greatest characters in literature.
Scarlett O’Hara is a heroine that you disdain at times, but you can’t
stop reading about her. Rhett Butler is
a scoundrel that you root for, and at his heart, he truly loves Scarlett. There are so many good characters in this
story.
In this reading of the classic tale, I was struck by
how both Rhett Butler and Ashley Wilkes are realistic about the Civil War. They both talk about how politicians and
people with money have riled up the populace to fight in a war that they can’t
win and that doesn’t benefit most of the people of the south. I loved this quote by Rhett Butler, “All wars
are sacred to those who have to fight them. If the people who started wars
didn't make them sacred, who would be foolish enough to fight? But, no matter
what rallying cries the orators give to the idiots who fight, no matter what
noble purposes they assign to wars, there is never but one reason for war. And
that is money. All wars are in reality money squabbles. But so, few people ever
realize it. Their ears are too full of bugles and drums and fine words from
stay-at-home orators. Sometimes the rallying cry is 'Save the Tomb of Christ
from the Heathen!' Sometimes it's 'Down with Popery!' and sometimes 'Liberty!'
and sometimes 'Cotton, slavery, and States' Rights!'” Some things don’t change. I totally didn’t remember these views in Gone
with the Wind.
It was an interesting look at how the war changed
everything in Georgia. It does show how
the war came right to where they lived and changed their lives forever. The siege of Atlanta was one of the most
thrilling sections of a book that I have ever read. It was sad as characters you’ve grown to know
died seemingly senseless deaths.
The book does paint a fantasy version of the perfect
South that never really existed. For
instance, the black characters in the story are all happy slaves before the
war. After the war, free black people
are not looked too kindly upon. The most
troubling aspect of the novel is that pretty much everyone Scarlett knows is in
the Ku Klux Klan and it’s painted as a great organization that is protecting
the women of the south. It’s a very strange
thing to read, especially knowing that Scarlett is Catholic and the KKK does
not look too kindly upon Catholics. This
must be how the author in the 1930s South rationalized the KKK and its
existence.
I’ve recently been disturbed to see people who have
never read this novel stating on my classic book club pages that you are racist
if you’ve read this novel or enjoyed this novel. I find that troubling as well. You will never learn about the past and take
a good look at what was bad and good if you just label things as racist without
reading them and having discussions on them.
If we can’t look at the past to learn from our mistakes, I don’t know
how we will move forward.
Book Source: I
own two copies of this book. One is a
June 1936 edition that I bought at an auction (sadly May 1936 is the first
edition) and the other that I got at a half off bookstore. It’s a beautiful copy as well. This time around, I read it on my Kindle.
I loved your review! Gone With the Wind is my favorite novel of all time and I also reviewed it on my website ShellieLovesBooks. We had similar feelings about needing to read it and not just brand it as racist to do so. I loved your quote from Rhett. How true! I'd forgotten it. And how you compared Rhett and Ashley, great insight I hadn't thought about before.
ReplyDeleteThank-you!
DeleteI fell in love with GWTW as a teenager and have read it a few times since then. My current feeling it is that is a fairly accurate description of how many in the South viewed the war at the time it was written. Margaret Mitchell was a terrific novelist and definitely sweeps the reader into the story. While it is not a balanced picture of the Civil War, nor is it non-fiction, it did spark my life-long interest in learning about the Civil War.
ReplyDeleteI agree - it also has given me a life long interest in learning about the civil war as well.
DeleteI have read this book a few times now and I love it. I do understand why there are modern critics of some aspects of it but the story itself is compelling.
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing this review with the Historical Fiction Reading Challenge.
Thank-you! I think its a compelling story as well.
Delete